Sports Information

Jump to content.
My Great Web page

Anxiety in Kids

Like the adults, the children can also suffer of anxiety. In fact, the anxiety in children is due to hope at specific moments during the development and is in those cases watched like normal (for example, the first day of school). Some children can also suffer of excessive timidity and can fight to adjust to new situations. They can still not have the ability to vocalize his sensations, nor the capacity to handle them – causing that their fears and anxieties is still more difficult so that they face up to him. The majority of the children is scared of brief duration, and grows quickly outside them whereas they learn with the experience that is no true danger in the things that fear. For example, a boy will learn that there are no monsters underneath the bed or that when the mother goes away for the work, she will return at the end of the day. This is watched like routine part of the development. Some children are more anxious than others and can need reinsurance or additional aid a professional, especially if a disorder is suspected anxiety.

The anxiety becomes a problem if it begins to affect the daily routine of his boy or if it is causing to his young significant agitation. When is normal in the boy the anxiety? It is normal that all the children feel certain anxieties in the development stages. Between 7 and 11 months, the young people will often feel anxious around unknown faces. Between 7 months and the 3 years, the majority of the children feels anxiety when they are separated of his caretakers. The young children can be scared of brief duration, such as fear of the darkness, the storms, animal, or monstruos" , and they often develop temporary phobias after bad particular experiences.

The Anxiety

It is of utmost importance to point my experience in order to provide to greater credibility to the alleged arguments. I frequented the church catholic many years, an inherited tradition of family, in this context of my history I identify myself as a person intolerante and extremely incapable to disagree with the Christian dogmtica, exactly without understanding I agreed fully, from fear. When entering in the university, fidgets for the fact had exactly appeared not to obtain to exteriorizar the explanation concerning my mundane faith and other questions. I moved away myself from the church and I left to believe an absolute, infallible and perfect God. I returned to frequent the church, but I defend vehement my conceptions, exactly that they are contradictory the religious belief, I search logical and discerning clarifications daily to characterize my faith, if it will not be possible, I do not share of the same one and less still I propagate an absent conception of probatory effect. In such a way I recognize that I do not feel the emptiness that results of the absence of a religion and contributes to rationally filter the rules that me are taxes for the Christian dogmtica, similar of that the church if does not make solid through charlatanism, manipulation and ostentation, respecting the freedom that is inherent and constructing an ethical sense to me, subsidized for the estimated one of the faith. Valley still to say that the biggest happened wealth of this experience was the fruition of values that today I share as the respect, tolerance and rational emancipation. I defend despite it is improbable the retrocession of my current condition for the previous one, therefore, the certainty of legitimacy of my position is not only bigger of what the anxiety to rescue people who are ' ' cegas' ' , that is, disabled to glimpse the true conscientious faith, that one that evolves and if it makes solid with the reason.

The Anxious

In resistance, the uncertain people would wait for negative results in episodes of anger. This belief, pessimist is derived from the lack of confidence that has of their actions (Carmelley & Janoff-Bulman, mentioned in Mikulincer, M. 1998a). The anxious-ambivalent people, would show to major propensity the wrath that the safe people. The evitativas people, undergo frequent and intense episodes of anger, and their repressive style and its tendency a to appear of a positive way could take to these people to deny any propensity to the wrath. In relation to the form to undergo the wrath, the safe people once angered would think about solving the situation and to improve the quality of the relation (I put constructive), express their anger of controlled way and without many signals of hostility, the anxious-ambivalent experience of anger of the evitativo style and people, would be characterized by destructive goals, becoming unaccustomed answers and wild short whiles of hostile anger, suffering pain and other negative emotions. (Mikulincer, M. 1998 a).

DISCUSSION One comments, that the theory of the attachment, especially the proposal by Bowlby, has been very useful, since it has generated diverse investigations and studies in varied aspects of the human behavior, which corresponds to which the social psychologists consider like a good theory, that is to say, to guide and to stimulate the investigation, generating diverse hypotheses to verify them. The theory is indicated in addition, that it seems quite useful, since it allows to know, to deduce from the knowledge of the style of attachment of a person, many of its personal characteristics that are not so evident. Nevertheless, the so strict or rigid classifications cannot be considered of way, although they represent a reference frame, do not determine a specific behavior, therefore, they are not always absolute predictions. This is more reflected in many studies that give account of the different forms to behave, often independent of the style of attachment and related to a situation or specific scope, as it happens in the interpersonal area and of the personality. Really, it sorprndase as you related to the attachment are and avoids to be employee of him, maintains a significant distance so that it does not harm it, does not affect it.